JOSHUA ROSENBERG, DO
2020 PALOMINO LANE STE # 100, LAS VEGAS, NV 89106
NPI Number
1023078987
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$68,169
-89% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,400
Total Claims
2,967
$ Per Patient
$28
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#36 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.2
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $68,169 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74177 | CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (with contrast dye) | 206 | $20,741 | 30.4% | $101 |
| 70450 | CT scan of the head (without contrast dye) | 331 | $15,421 | 22.6% | $47 |
| 71046 | Chest X-ray (two views — front and side) | 918 | $9,562 | 14.0% | $10 |
| 71045 | Chest X-ray (single view) | 1,093 | $7,383 | 10.8% | $7 |
| 74176 | CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (without contrast) | 68 | $6,846 | 10.0% | $101 |
| 77067 | Screening mammogram (breast cancer screening) | 38 | $5,376 | 7.9% | $141 |
| 73564 | Lower extremity imaging (hip, knee, leg, foot) | 49 | $1,564 | 2.3% | $32 |
| 72110 | X-ray of the lower spine (complete, multiple views) | 18 | $864 | 1.3% | $48 |
| 73610 | X-ray of the ankle (complete) | 14 | $244 | 0.4% | $17 |
| 74018 | X-ray of the abdomen (single view) | 39 | $168 | 0.2% | $4 |
| 99053 | Special medical service | 193 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.