WILLIAM RESH, MD
3150 N TENAYA WAY SUITE 320, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128
NPI Number
1083637235
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$163,328
-56% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,442
Total Claims
1,635
$ Per Patient
$113
Specialty avg: $35
Specialty Rank
#16 of 93
Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Disease providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$369,495
Average total for Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Disease
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $163,328 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78452 | Nuclear medicine imaging (using small amounts of radioactive material) | 79 | $40,061 | 24.5% | $507 |
| 93306 | Heart ultrasound (echocardiogram) | 204 | $37,509 | 23.0% | $184 |
| 99214 | Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient) | 225 | $23,111 | 14.1% | $103 |
| 99215 | Office visit for a complex or serious problem (established patient) | 133 | $18,744 | 11.5% | $141 |
| 99205 | New patient office visit — comprehensive visit for a complex problem | 79 | $15,771 | 9.7% | $200 |
| A9500 | Technetium tc-99m sestamibi, diagnostic, per study dose | 79 | $14,647 | 9.0% | $185 |
| 93015 | Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG) | 114 | $7,659 | 4.7% | $67 |
| 93000 | Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG) | 257 | $3,732 | 2.3% | $15 |
| 93010 | Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG) | 465 | $2,094 | 1.3% | $5 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.