← Back to Provider List

OLA EISA, M.D.

Family Medicine · PAHRUMP, NV

1501 E CALVADA BLVD, PAHRUMP, NV 89048

NPI Number
1184806135
Total Medicaid Payments
$104,215
-67% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,868
Total Claims
2,178
$ Per Patient
$56
Specialty avg: $54
Specialty Rank
#122 of 420
Family Medicine providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$314,431
Average total for Family Medicine
Claims per Patient
1.2
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$102,490
2019$1,725

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
99214Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient)526$53,000
50.9%
$101
99213Office visit for a simple problem (established patient)385$23,672
22.7%
$61
99205New patient office visit — comprehensive visit for a complex problem95$18,396
17.7%
$194
99203New patient office visit — moderate problem34$3,330
3.2%
$98
94760Breathing test or lung function test626$1,517
1.5%
$2
87804Flu test (rapid)146$1,517
1.5%
$10
96372IV infusion or injection of medication51$1,070
1.0%
$21
87880Strep throat test (rapid)58$623
0.6%
$11
J0696Injection of ceftriaxone (antibiotic, usually given for serious infections)13$370
0.4%
$28
J3301Injection of triamcinolone (steroid for inflammation or joint pain)31$307
0.3%
$10
93000Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)14$202
0.2%
$14
81025Pregnancy test (urine)21$118
0.1%
$6
81003Urinalysis — automated test48$95
0.1%
$2
99051Special medical service130$0
0.0%
$0

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.