ROBERTSON & KOENIG, LTD SOS Verified
233 S MAIN ST, YERINGTON, NV 89447
NPI Number
1215129069
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: ROBERTSON & KOENIG, LTD.
Entity Number: C7751-2001
Entity Type: Domestic Professional Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2001-03-27
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: Carl Robertson
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 65 N. Taylor St., Fallon, NV, 89406
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| President | CARL ROBERTSON | 4989 RIVERS EDGE DR., FALLON, NV, 89406 | Active |
| Secretary | GREGORY KOENIG | 2330 THURMAN LANE, FALLON, NV, 89406 | Active |
| Treasurer | CARL ROBERTSON | 4989 RIVERS EDGE DR., FALLON, NV, 89406 | Active |
| Director | CARL ROBERTSON | 4989 RIVERS EDGE DR., FALLON, NV, 89406 | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$11,750Total Contributed
4Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
GREGORY KoenigConfirmed Match
Matched via officer: GREGORY KOENIG (Secretary)
$10,000 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Koenig | State Assembly, District 38 | Republican Party | $10,000 | 1 |
Gregory and Debra KoenigProbable Match
Matched via officer: GREGORY KOENIG (Secretary)
$750 across 2 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rusty Jardine | Churchill County, Commissioner, District III | Republican Party | $500 | 1 |
| Robin Titus | State Senate, District 17 | Republican Party | $250 | 1 |
Gregg KoenigProbable Match
Matched via officer: GREGORY KOENIG (Secretary)
$1,000 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Hyde | Churchill County, Commissioner, District I | Republican Party | $1,000 | 1 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$303,245
+67% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
6,661
Total Claims
6,935
$ Per Patient
$46
Specialty avg: $38
Specialty Rank
#51 of 377
Optometrist providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$181,896
Average total for Optometrist
Claims per Patient
1.0
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $81,152 | |
| 2019 | $51,355 | |
| 2020 | $33,857 | |
| 2021 | $34,021 | |
| 2022 | $36,900 | |
| 2023 | $43,865 | |
| 2024 | $22,094 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V2020 | Frames, purchases | 1,699 | $127,481 | 42.0% | $75 |
| 92250 | Eye exam or vision test | 1,528 | $44,383 | 14.6% | $29 |
| 92014 | Eye exam or vision test | 349 | $38,866 | 12.8% | $111 |
| 92340 | Eye exam or vision test | 953 | $30,127 | 9.9% | $32 |
| 92015 | Eye exam or vision test | 1,750 | $29,334 | 9.7% | $17 |
| V2103 | Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, .12 to 2.00d cylinder, per lens | 287 | $13,501 | 4.5% | $47 |
| 92004 | Eye exam or vision test | 87 | $11,311 | 3.7% | $130 |
| V2760 | Scratch resistant coating, per lens | 269 | $7,534 | 2.5% | $28 |
| V2100 | Sphere, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00, per lens | 13 | $707 | 0.2% | $54 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.