← Back to Provider List

RICHARD SCHWARTZ, M.D.

Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology · LAS VEGAS, NV

3061 S MARYLAND PKWY SUITE 102, LAS VEGAS, NV 89109

NPI Number
1225017056
Street View of 3061 S MARYLAND PKWY SUITE 102, LAS VEGAS, NV 89109

Practice location · View on Google Maps

Total Medicaid Payments
$61,899
-90% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,290
Total Claims
3,243
$ Per Patient
$27
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#41 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.4
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$61,899

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
74177CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (with contrast dye)206$18,154
29.3%
$88
76815Limited ultrasound of pregnancy (quick check)225$7,134
11.5%
$32
76700Ultrasound of the abdomen (complete)176$6,867
11.1%
$39
71045Chest X-ray (single view)1,306$6,642
10.7%
$5
76856Pelvic ultrasound (complete)177$5,059
8.2%
$29
76830Transvaginal ultrasound of the uterus153$4,801
7.8%
$31
76817Transvaginal ultrasound of pregnancy100$3,690
6.0%
$37
71046Chest X-ray (two views — front and side)447$2,704
4.4%
$6
93975Blood vessel ultrasound or study41$2,639
4.3%
$64
74018X-ray of the abdomen (single view)358$1,522
2.5%
$4
71275CT angiography of the chest (looking at blood vessels)14$1,317
2.1%
$94
93976Blood vessel ultrasound or study22$943
1.5%
$43
76705Ultrasound of the abdomen (limited)18$427
0.7%
$24

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.