NEVADA URBAN INDIANS, INC. SOS Verified
6512 S. MCCARRAN BLVD. SUITE A, B, C, RENO, NV 89509
NPI Number
1235547993
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: NEVADA URBAN INDIANS, INC.
Entity Number: C2524-1975
Entity Type: Domestic Nonprofit Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 1975-08-14
Status Changed: 2015-10-26
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: Nevada Urban Indians, Inc
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 9480 Gateway Dr., Suite 100, Reno, NV, 89521
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Director | Janet Reeves | PO Box 21834, Carson City, NV | Active |
| Treasurer | Lavina Pancho | 1265 Trainer Way, Reno, NV | Active |
| President | Idora Silver | 3855 Piccadilly Dr., Reno, NV | Active |
| Secretary | Dan Olsen | 8064 N. Hat Creek Ct., Sparks, NV | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$60,300Total Contributed
4Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
IDORA SILVERProbable Match
Matched via officer: Idora Silver (President)
$60,000 across 2 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idora Silver | City of Reno, Mayor | Nonpartisan | $60,000 | 2 |
REEVES, JANETProbable Match
Matched via officer: Janet Reeves (Director)
$200 across 2 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORTEZ MASTO, CATHERINE | U.S. Senate | DEM | $4,000 | 40 |
| MASTO, CATHERINE CORTEZ | U.S. Senate | DEM | $2,000 | 20 |
Idora SilverProbable Match
Matched via officer: Idora Silver (President)
Idora SilverProbable Match
Matched via officer: Idora Silver (President)
$100 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Marshall | Lieutenant Governor | Democratic Party | $100 | 1 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$1,039,565
+12% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,160
Total Claims
3,090
$ Per Patient
$481
Specialty avg: $44
Specialty Rank
#7 of 21
Clinic/Center, Community Health providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$926,981
Average total for Clinic/Center, Community Health
Claims per Patient
1.4
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $56,930 | |
| 2019 | $90,343 | |
| 2020 | $125,498 | |
| 2021 | $314,326 | |
| 2022 | $295,151 | |
| 2023 | $60,501 | |
| 2024 | $96,816 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1015 | All-inclusive clinic visit — covers everything in one trip to the clinic | 2,161 | $879,370 | 84.6% | $407 |
| G0470 | Federally qualified health center (community health center) visit, mental health, established patient; a medically-necessary | 474 | $90,114 | 8.7% | $190 |
| G0467 | Federally Qualified Health Center visit — a community health center visit for regular patients | 389 | $67,203 | 6.5% | $173 |
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 46 | $2,878 | 0.3% | $63 |
| G0469 | Federally qualified health center (community health center) visit, mental health, new patient; a medically-necessary | 20 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.