← Back to Provider List

NADIA BEACHAM, D.M.D.

Dentist, General Practice · LAS VEGAS, NV

3360 W CACTUS AVE STE 150, LAS VEGAS, NV 89141

NPI Number
1245474402
Street View of 3360 W CACTUS AVE STE 150, LAS VEGAS, NV 89141

Practice location · View on Google Maps

Total Medicaid Payments
$146,846
-65% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
4,438
Total Claims
4,703
$ Per Patient
$33
Specialty avg: $36
Specialty Rank
#81 of 248
Dentist, General Practice providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$419,652
Average total for Dentist, General Practice
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2019$82,858
2020$63,989

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
D2150Silver (amalgam) filling — two surfaces373$29,939
20.4%
$80
D1110Dental cleaning for adults (prophylaxis)483$22,342
15.2%
$46
D0120Regular dental checkup and exam827$21,631
14.7%
$26
D0272Dental X-ray — bitewings (two films)743$17,921
12.2%
$24
D1208Dental preventive care (cleaning, fluoride, sealant)721$14,099
9.6%
$20
D2140Silver (amalgam) filling — one surface215$13,855
9.4%
$64
D1120Dental cleaning for children (prophylaxis)339$11,989
8.2%
$35
D9230Analgesia (pain management during dental work, like nitrous oxide/laughing gas)321$8,192
5.6%
$26
D0603Dental exam, X-ray, or screening521$2,564
1.7%
$5
D2160Silver (amalgam) filling — three surfaces17$1,599
1.1%
$94
D1206Fluoride treatment — painted on teeth to prevent cavities79$1,576
1.1%
$20
D0220Single dental X-ray (of one tooth)64$1,137
0.8%
$18

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.