TODD ANGELL, O.D.
1300 S EASTERN AVE, LAS VEGAS, NV 89104
NPI Number
1265465306
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$132,856
-27% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
3,865
Total Claims
3,914
$ Per Patient
$34
Specialty avg: $38
Specialty Rank
#104 of 377
Optometrist providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$181,896
Average total for Optometrist
Claims per Patient
1.0
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $22,806 | |
| 2019 | $5,316 | |
| 2020 | $3,392 | |
| 2021 | $7,540 | |
| 2022 | $3,325 | |
| 2023 | $39,150 | |
| 2024 | $51,327 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92014 | Eye exam or vision test | 502 | $35,204 | 26.5% | $70 |
| V2020 | Frames, purchases | 1,073 | $31,078 | 23.4% | $29 |
| 92004 | Eye exam or vision test | 426 | $29,127 | 21.9% | $68 |
| 92015 | Eye exam or vision test | 912 | $18,080 | 13.6% | $20 |
| 92340 | Eye exam or vision test | 483 | $10,137 | 7.6% | $21 |
| V2103 | Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, .12 to 2.00d cylinder, per lens | 266 | $4,875 | 3.7% | $18 |
| V2100 | Sphere, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00, per lens | 116 | $3,314 | 2.5% | $29 |
| V2784 | Lens, polycarbonate or equal, any index, per lens | 124 | $861 | 0.6% | $7 |
| V2104 | Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, 2.12 to 4.00d cylinder, per lens | 12 | $180 | 0.1% | $15 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.