NKDHC RUDNITSKY PLLC SOS Verified
2545 S BRUCE ST STE 200, LAS VEGAS, NV 89169
NPI Number
1265831432
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: NKDHC (RUDNITSKY) PLLC
Entity Number: E0178092013-1
Entity Type: Domestic Professional LLC
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2013-04-10
Status Changed: 2015-05-27
Name Match: 100%
Registered Agent
Name: HENRY LICHTENBERGER
Type: Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 410 S RAMPART BLVD STE 350, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89145
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manager | Radhika Janga MD | 2450 Fire Mesa Street, Suite 110, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
| Manager | Arvin Gupta MD | 2450 Fire Mesa Street, Suite 110, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
| Manager | Sundar Sankaran MD | 2450 Fire Mesa Street, Suite 110, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
| Manager | Sujatha Raju MD | 2450 Fire Mesa Street, Suite 110, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
| Manager | Benjamin Rudnitsky MD | 2450 Fire Mesa Street, Suite 110, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$4,300Total Contributed
2Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
RUDNITSKY, BENJAMINProbable Match
Matched via officer: Benjamin Rudnitsky MD (Manager)
$1,000 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HELLER, DEAN | U.S. Senate | REP | $18,000 | 18 |
Radhika JangaProbable Match
Matched via officer: Radhika Janga MD (Manager)
$1,000 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wesley Duncan | Attorney General | Republican Party | $1,000 | 1 |
RAJU, SUJATHAProbable Match
Matched via officer: Sujatha Raju MD (Manager)
$2,000 across 6 contributions
SANKARAN, SUNDARPossible Match
Matched via officer: Sundar Sankaran MD (Manager)
$300 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HELLER, DEAN | U.S. Senate | REP | $5,400 | 18 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$9,182,491
+1332% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
67,385
Total Claims
151,002
$ Per Patient
$136
Specialty avg: $122
Specialty Rank
#2 of 44
Internal Medicine, Nephrology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$641,404
Average total for Internal Medicine, Nephrology
Claims per Patient
2.2
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $502,496 | |
| 2019 | $1,227,801 | |
| 2020 | $1,417,346 | |
| 2021 | $1,966,684 | |
| 2022 | $1,717,283 | |
| 2023 | $1,632,529 | |
| 2024 | $718,353 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99233 | Hospital care — daily check by your doctor (complex update) | 95,578 | $5,658,992 | 61.6% | $59 |
| 90960 | End-stage kidney disease monthly care — for patients 20 and older, 4+ visits | 14,117 | $1,403,485 | 15.3% | $99 |
| 99232 | Hospital care — daily check by your doctor (moderate update) | 24,021 | $902,554 | 9.8% | $38 |
| 99223 | Hospital admission — first day, complex or serious problem | 5,382 | $593,207 | 6.5% | $110 |
| 99214 | Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient) | 3,757 | $234,384 | 2.6% | $62 |
| 90961 | End-stage kidney disease monthly care — for patients 20 and older, 2-3 visits | 2,187 | $169,844 | 1.8% | $78 |
| 36902 | Artery and vein surgery | 1,467 | $88,502 | 1.0% | $60 |
| 93970 | Blood vessel ultrasound or study | 395 | $36,288 | 0.4% | $92 |
| 99215 | Office visit for a complex or serious problem (established patient) | 373 | $22,892 | 0.2% | $61 |
| 90966 | End-stage kidney disease monthly care — for patients 20+, home dialysis | 316 | $17,141 | 0.2% | $54 |
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 294 | $15,541 | 0.2% | $53 |
| G0438 | Annual wellness visit — first time | 193 | $10,272 | 0.1% | $53 |
| 99152 | Medical service or procedure | 556 | $5,144 | 0.1% | $9 |
| 76775 | Ultrasound | 130 | $3,838 | 0.0% | $30 |
| 99222 | Hospital admission — first day, moderate to serious problem | 46 | $3,797 | 0.0% | $83 |
| 99204 | New patient office visit — detailed visit for a serious problem | 37 | $3,674 | 0.0% | $99 |
| G0365 | Vessel mapping of vessels for hemodialysis access (services for preoperative vessel mapping prior to creation of hemodialysis access using an autogenous hemodialysis conduit | 100 | $3,440 | 0.0% | $34 |
| 93990 | Blood vessel ultrasound or study | 29 | $3,091 | 0.0% | $107 |
| 99203 | New patient office visit — moderate problem | 28 | $2,297 | 0.0% | $82 |
| 90962 | End-stage kidney disease monthly care — for patients 20 and older, 1 visit | 49 | $1,828 | 0.0% | $37 |
| 76770 | Ultrasound of the abdomen and kidneys (complete) | 14 | $1,002 | 0.0% | $72 |
| 36901 | Artery and vein surgery | 15 | $591 | 0.0% | $39 |
| 99212 | Office visit for a minor problem (established patient) | 15 | $296 | 0.0% | $20 |
| Q9967 | Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml | 1,468 | $205 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G2211 | Visit complexity inherent to evaluation and management associated with medical care services that serve as the continuing focal point for all needed health care services and/or with medical care se... | 423 | $187 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 90970 | End-stage kidney disease home dialysis monthly care — ages 20+ | 12 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.