HOWARD FRANCOIS, M.D.
2020 PALOMINO LN SUITE 100, LAS VEGAS, NV 89106
NPI Number
1285831172
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$19,540
-97% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
751
Total Claims
991
$ Per Patient
$26
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#88 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.3
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $19,540 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74177 | CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (with contrast dye) | 79 | $7,353 | 37.6% | $93 |
| 71045 | Chest X-ray (single view) | 400 | $2,418 | 12.4% | $6 |
| 74176 | CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (without contrast) | 28 | $2,366 | 12.1% | $84 |
| 77067 | Screening mammogram (breast cancer screening) | 16 | $2,264 | 11.6% | $141 |
| 71046 | Chest X-ray (two views — front and side) | 213 | $1,925 | 9.9% | $9 |
| 73630 | X-ray of the foot | 55 | $1,304 | 6.7% | $24 |
| 74018 | X-ray of the abdomen (single view) | 92 | $758 | 3.9% | $8 |
| 70450 | CT scan of the head (without contrast dye) | 16 | $525 | 2.7% | $33 |
| 73130 | X-ray of the hand | 20 | $522 | 2.7% | $26 |
| Q9967 | Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml | 15 | $106 | 0.5% | $7 |
| 99053 | Special medical service | 57 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.