SUSAN REISINGER, MD PROF. CORP. SOS Verified
2851 N TENAYA WAY STE 100, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128
NPI Number
1295703346
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: SUSAN REISINGER, MD, PROF. CORP.
Entity Number: C483-1998
Entity Type: Domestic Professional Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 1998-01-09
Status Changed: 2009-03-24
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY*
Type: Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 112 NORTH CURRY STREET, Carson City, NV, 89703
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Director | Jason Kehrer | 3654 Pinot Grigio Dr., Reno, NV | Active |
| Director | Kevin Sanders | 320 N. 10th St., Tacoma, WA | Active |
| Director | Suraj Singh | 6925 Dornoch Ct., Timnath, CO | Active |
| Director | Guy Jones | 2665 Spinnaker Dr, Reno, NV | Active |
| Director | David Greene | 20040 Tumalo Rd, Bend, OR | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$14,332Total Contributed
4Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
Guy JonesProbable Match
Matched via officer: Guy Jones (Director)
$2,000 across 2 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada Medical Political Action Committee (NEMPAC) | PAC | $2,000 | 2 |
JONES, GUYProbable Match
Matched via officer: Guy Jones (Director)
$2,082 across 2 contributions
GREENE, DAVIDProbable Match
Matched via officer: David Greene (Director)
$10,000 across 8 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, SAM | U.S. Senate | REP | $6,000 | 12 |
Surjit SinghPossible Match
Matched via officer: Suraj Singh (Director)
$200 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Seroka | City of Las Vegas, City Council, Ward 2 (Inactive) | Unspecified | $200 | 1 |
Kevin SandersPossible Match
Matched via officer: Kevin Sanders (Director)
$50 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinny Spotleson | Office Not Specified | Democratic Party | $50 | 1 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$21,467
0% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
126
Total Claims
420
$ Per Patient
$170
Specialty Rank
#? of ?
providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$0
Average total for
Claims per Patient
3.3
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $8,167 | |
| 2021 | $1,596 | |
| 2023 | $4,085 | |
| 2024 | $7,619 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G6002 | Stereoscopic x-ray guidance for localization of target volume for the delivery of radiation therapy | 310 | $11,839 | 55.1% | $38 |
| G6015 | Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session | 52 | $6,830 | 31.8% | $131 |
| 77300 | Radiation therapy for cancer | 24 | $1,702 | 7.9% | $71 |
| 77336 | Radiation therapy for cancer | 21 | $744 | 3.5% | $35 |
| 99212 | Office visit for a minor problem (established patient) | 13 | $351 | 1.6% | $27 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.