VITALVIDA PRIMARY CARE
2820 W CHARLESTON BLVD # D40, LAS VEGAS, NV 89102
NPI Number
1326886433
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Pending Review
Multiple SOS Matches
Total Medicaid Payments
$286,613
-88% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,340
Total Claims
8,944
$ Per Patient
$122
Specialty avg: $313
Specialty Rank
#32 of 62
Clinic/Center providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$2,426,494
Average total for Clinic/Center
Claims per Patient
3.8
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $286,613 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98960 | Medical service or procedure | 2,292 | $97,712 | 34.1% | $43 |
| Q3014 | Telehealth originating site facility fee | 2,289 | $50,911 | 17.8% | $22 |
| 97112 | Neuromuscular re-education — retraining muscles and movement patterns | 899 | $50,706 | 17.7% | $56 |
| 99211 | Simple office visit — quick check-in with a nurse or doctor | 1,739 | $31,195 | 10.9% | $18 |
| 97032 | Physical therapy, occupational therapy, or rehabilitation | 898 | $28,865 | 10.1% | $32 |
| 99203 | New patient office visit — moderate problem | 161 | $11,314 | 3.9% | $70 |
| 96138 | Psychological testing — administered by a technician (first 30 min) | 292 | $8,529 | 3.0% | $29 |
| 97016 | Physical therapy, occupational therapy, or rehabilitation | 348 | $5,650 | 2.0% | $16 |
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 26 | $1,729 | 0.6% | $66 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.