← Back to Provider List

VISHAL GANDOTRA, MD

Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology · LAS VEGAS, NV

5701 W CHARLESTON BLVD STE 201, LAS VEGAS, NV 89146

NPI Number
1336137603
Street View of 5701 W CHARLESTON BLVD STE 201, LAS VEGAS, NV 89146

Practice location · View on Google Maps

Total Medicaid Payments
$191,244
-41% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,438
Total Claims
1,534
$ Per Patient
$133
Specialty avg: $88
Specialty Rank
#6 of 53
Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$323,527
Average total for Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$191,244

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
45380Colonoscopy with biopsy (tissue sample)376$88,210
46.1%
$235
43239Upper endoscopy with biopsy (camera down the throat to look at stomach, with tissue sample)411$35,887
18.8%
$87
99204New patient office visit — detailed visit for a serious problem131$20,314
10.6%
$155
99213Office visit for a simple problem (established patient)332$18,102
9.5%
$55
45378Colonoscopy — camera exam of the large intestine (diagnostic)44$8,983
4.7%
$204
99243Office consultation — moderate problem115$7,755
4.1%
$67
99203New patient office visit — moderate problem40$3,913
2.0%
$98
99244Office consultation — serious problem44$3,605
1.9%
$82
99214Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient)29$2,785
1.5%
$96
45381Rectum and colon surgery or exam12$1,691
0.9%
$141

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.