← Back to Provider List

AM-PM PERSONAL CARE LLC SOS Verified

Technician, Personal Care Attendant · LAS VEGAS, NV

820 RANCHO LN STE 25, LAS VEGAS, NV 89106

NPI Number
1396395257
Street View of 820 RANCHO LN STE 25, LAS VEGAS, NV 89106

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: AM/PM PERSONAL CARE LLC
Entity Number: E0138882011-6
Entity Type: Domestic Limited-Liability Company
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2011-03-11
Status Changed: 2012-04-26
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: CLAUDI Y NUNEZ
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 820 RANCHO LANE, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89106
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
ManagerCLAUDIA NUNEZ1640 E SAHARA SUITE E LAS VEGAS NV 89104, Las Vegas, NVActive
Total Medicaid Payments
$6,582,522
+112% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
6,277
Total Claims
77,674
$ Per Patient
$1,049
Specialty avg: $980
Specialty Rank
#3 of 31
Technician, Personal Care Attendant providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$3,104,173
Average total for Technician, Personal Care Attendant
Claims per Patient
12.4
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2019$224,447
2020$1,145,634
2021$1,263,521
2022$1,084,545
2023$1,261,963
2024$1,602,412

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
T1019Personal care services — a helper who assists with daily activities like bathing, dressing, and eating (per 15 minutes)77,674$6,582,522
100.0%
$85

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.