← Back to Provider List

TANVIR AHMAD, MD

Internal Medicine, Interventional Cardiology · LAS VEGAS, NV

7020 SMOKE RANCH RD SUITE 150, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128

NPI Number
1457334864
Street View of 7020 SMOKE RANCH RD SUITE 150, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128

Practice location · View on Google Maps

Total Medicaid Payments
$131,468
+125% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
9,492
Total Claims
14,269
$ Per Patient
$14
Specialty avg: $32
Specialty Rank
#3 of 24
Internal Medicine, Interventional Cardiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$58,490
Average total for Internal Medicine, Interventional Cardiology
Claims per Patient
1.5
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$35,695
2019$43,296
2020$16,428
2021$19,795
2022$8,640
2023$6,476
2024$1,138

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
93010Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)10,399$38,537
29.3%
$4
93306Heart ultrasound (echocardiogram)1,213$32,778
24.9%
$27
99214Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient)1,295$31,272
23.8%
$24
99232Hospital care — daily check by your doctor (moderate update)863$13,620
10.4%
$16
99222Hospital admission — first day, moderate to serious problem213$7,342
5.6%
$34
78452Nuclear medicine imaging (using small amounts of radioactive material)127$6,915
5.3%
$54
93000Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)117$508
0.4%
$4
93015Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)18$434
0.3%
$24
93018Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)24$63
0.0%
$3

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.