← Back to Provider List

G D SHOENBERGER, INC. SOS Verified

Psychologist, Clinical · RENO, NV

636 LANDER ST, RENO, NV 89509

NPI Number
1487999579
Street View of 636 LANDER ST, RENO, NV 89509

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: G D SHOENBERGER, INC.
Entity Number: E0227562009-2
Entity Type: Domestic Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2009-04-22
Status Changed: 2010-03-22
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: Natalie Sanchez
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 245 Mt Rose Street, Reno, NV, 89509
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
PresidentGeorge Shoenberger624 John Fremont Dr, Reno, NVActive
SecretaryGEORGE DEACON SHOENBERGER624 John Fremont Dr, Reno, NVActive
TreasurerGEORGE DEACON SHOENBERGER624 John Fremont Dr, Reno, NVActive
DirectorGeorge Shoenberger624 John Fremont Dr, Reno, NVActive
Campaign Contributions
$8,450Total Contributed
5Candidates Supported
Corporate Matches
G D Shoenberger, Inc.Confirmed Match
$400 across 2 contributions
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Elissa CadishSupreme Court Justice, Seat CNonpartisan$4002
G D Shoenberger Inc.Probable Match
$500 across 2 contributions
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Lidia StiglichSupreme Court Justice, Seat GNonpartisan$5002
Officer / Individual Matches
SHOENBERGER, GEORGEProbable Match
Matched via officer: George Shoenberger (President)
$6,650 across 29 contributions
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
KOBLE, CLINT MATTHEW MR.U.S. HouseDEM$4,00016
George ShoenbergerProbable Match
Matched via officer: George Shoenberger (President)
$100 across 1 contribution
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
NVRPACPAC$1001
George ShoenbergerProbable Match
Matched via officer: George Shoenberger (President)
$500 across 2 contributions
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Chris GiunchiglianiGovernorDemocratic Party$5002
SHOENBERGER, GEORGE AProbable Match
Matched via officer: George Shoenberger (President)
$300 across 1 contribution
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$343,660
+15% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
5,509
Total Claims
6,268
$ Per Patient
$62
Specialty avg: $158
Specialty Rank
#5 of 29
Psychologist, Clinical providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$298,571
Average total for Psychologist, Clinical
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$48,745
2019$22,221
2020$19,398
2021$39,050
2022$36,475
2023$70,851
2024$106,921

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
96130Psychological or neuropsychological testing — evaluation by a psychologist (first hour)1,465$104,479
30.4%
$71
90791Mental health evaluation — first visit with a therapist or psychiatrist690$43,693
12.7%
$63
90834Individual therapy session (45 minutes)766$43,047
12.5%
$56
96137Psychological testing — additional 30 minutes582$37,148
10.8%
$64
96136Psychological testing — administered by a psychologist (first 30 min)1,302$34,644
10.1%
$27
96131Psychological or neuropsychological testing — additional testing time542$29,955
8.7%
$55
96101Psychological testing — administered and scored by a psychologist320$22,246
6.5%
$70
90837Individual therapy session (60 minutes)417$20,749
6.0%
$50
90832Individual therapy session (30 minutes)184$7,698
2.2%
$42

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.