← Back to Provider List

AMANJIT DHINDSA, M.D.

Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology · LAS VEGAS, NV

5495 S RAINBOW BLVD STE 101, LAS VEGAS, NV 89118

NPI Number
1528019163
Street View of 5495 S RAINBOW BLVD STE 101, LAS VEGAS, NV 89118

Practice location · View on Google Maps

Total Medicaid Payments
$71,993
-88% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,193
Total Claims
2,936
$ Per Patient
$33
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#32 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.3
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$71,993

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
74177CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (with contrast dye)237$21,776
30.2%
$92
74176CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (without contrast)204$17,878
24.8%
$88
70450CT scan of the head (without contrast dye)351$14,841
20.6%
$42
71045Chest X-ray (single view)1,223$8,724
12.1%
$7
71046Chest X-ray (two views — front and side)689$4,918
6.8%
$7
71275CT angiography of the chest (looking at blood vessels)14$1,395
1.9%
$100
74018X-ray of the abdomen (single view)124$748
1.0%
$6
76705Ultrasound of the abdomen (limited)26$721
1.0%
$28
76856Pelvic ultrasound (complete)13$460
0.6%
$35
73610X-ray of the ankle (complete)21$192
0.3%
$9
73630X-ray of the foot22$175
0.2%
$8
74022Abdomen imaging (X-ray, CT, or MRI)12$164
0.2%
$14

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.