CHAD POOPAT, M.D.
2020 PALOMINO LANE STE # 100, LAS VEGAS, NV 89106
NPI Number
1538178561
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$42,209
-93% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
690
Total Claims
865
$ Per Patient
$61
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#54 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.3
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $42,209 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77067 | Screening mammogram (breast cancer screening) | 183 | $18,155 | 43.0% | $99 |
| 76700 | Ultrasound of the abdomen (complete) | 48 | $6,332 | 15.0% | $132 |
| 76642 | Ultrasound | 48 | $4,663 | 11.0% | $97 |
| 76856 | Pelvic ultrasound (complete) | 27 | $2,712 | 6.4% | $100 |
| 76536 | Ultrasound of the head and neck soft tissue | 17 | $2,199 | 5.2% | $129 |
| 71046 | Chest X-ray (two views — front and side) | 160 | $2,017 | 4.8% | $13 |
| 71045 | Chest X-ray (single view) | 287 | $1,975 | 4.7% | $7 |
| 76830 | Transvaginal ultrasound of the uterus | 15 | $1,428 | 3.4% | $95 |
| 74176 | CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (without contrast) | 15 | $1,043 | 2.5% | $70 |
| 77063 | Breast imaging (mammogram or MRI) | 12 | $704 | 1.7% | $59 |
| 70450 | CT scan of the head (without contrast dye) | 18 | $601 | 1.4% | $33 |
| 74018 | X-ray of the abdomen (single view) | 35 | $381 | 0.9% | $11 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.