← Back to Provider List

SMI IMAGING LLC SOS Verified

Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology ยท LAS VEGAS, NV

3560 W FLAMINGO RD STE 100, LAS VEGAS, NV 89121

NPI Number
1548807274
Street View of 3560 W FLAMINGO RD STE 100, LAS VEGAS, NV 89121

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: SMI IMAGING, LLC
Entity Number: E0259062018-1
Entity Type: Foreign Limited-Liability Company
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2018-05-25
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM**
Type: Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 701 S CARSON ST STE 200, Carson City, NV, 89701
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
MemberHoward Simon16220 N. Scottsdale Rd, Suite 600, Scottsdale, AZActive
ManagerHoward Simon16220 N. Scottsdale Rd, Suite 600, Scottsdale, AZActive
MemberSimonmed Imaging LLC16220 N. Scottsdale Rd, Suite 600, Scottsdale, AZActive
Total Medicaid Payments
$3,397
-99% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
135
Total Claims
150
$ Per Patient
$25
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#138 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2022$3,397

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
77067Screening mammogram (breast cancer screening)74$2,405
70.8%
$33
77063Breast imaging (mammogram or MRI)76$992
29.2%
$13

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.