STEVEN TOPHAM, MD
2020 PALOMINO LN SUITE 100, LAS VEGAS, NV 89106
NPI Number
1568404812
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$26,440
-96% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,882
Total Claims
2,643
$ Per Patient
$14
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#71 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.4
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $26,440 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71045 | Chest X-ray (single view) | 1,578 | $10,049 | 38.0% | $6 |
| 71046 | Chest X-ray (two views — front and side) | 821 | $7,826 | 29.6% | $10 |
| 99152 | Medical service or procedure | 76 | $2,624 | 9.9% | $35 |
| 78452 | Nuclear medicine imaging (using small amounts of radioactive material) | 27 | $1,893 | 7.2% | $70 |
| 93880 | Blood vessel ultrasound or study | 13 | $1,067 | 4.0% | $82 |
| 76770 | Ultrasound of the abdomen and kidneys (complete) | 27 | $1,035 | 3.9% | $38 |
| 93970 | Blood vessel ultrasound or study | 16 | $847 | 3.2% | $53 |
| 76705 | Ultrasound of the abdomen (limited) | 31 | $757 | 2.9% | $24 |
| 74018 | X-ray of the abdomen (single view) | 29 | $215 | 0.8% | $7 |
| 73030 | X-ray of the shoulder | 12 | $128 | 0.5% | $11 |
| 99053 | Special medical service | 13 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.