← Back to Provider List

STUART FELDMAN, DPM

Podiatrist · HENDERSON, NV

8955 S PECOS RD SUITE 2-B, HENDERSON, NV 89074

NPI Number
1568685758
Street View of 8955 S PECOS RD SUITE 2-B, HENDERSON, NV 89074

Practice location · View on Google Maps

Total Medicaid Payments
$16,270
-54% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
297
Total Claims
333
$ Per Patient
$55
Specialty avg: $20
Specialty Rank
#13 of 34
Podiatrist providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$35,239
Average total for Podiatrist
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$10,659
2023$1,153
2024$4,458

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
99203New patient office visit — moderate problem153$9,675
59.5%
$63
99213Office visit for a simple problem (established patient)68$4,205
25.8%
$62
G0246Follow-up physician evaluation and management of a diabetic patient with diabetic sensory neuropathy resulting in a loss of protective sensation (lops) to include at least the following: (1) a pati...30$771
4.7%
$26
20550Musculoskeletal surgery (bones, joints, muscles)22$710
4.4%
$32
G0245Initial physician evaluation and management of a diabetic patient with diabetic sensory neuropathy resulting in a loss of protective sensation (lops) which must include: (1) the diagnosis of lops14$569
3.5%
$41
J1030Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg21$340
2.1%
$16
G0127Trimming of dystrophic nails, any number25$0
0.0%
$0

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.