GOLDING RADIOLOGY, LTD SOS Verified
590 EUREKA AVE, RENO, NV 89512
NPI Number
1588943328
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: GOLDING RADIOLOGY, LTD.
Entity Number: C16275-2002
Entity Type: Domestic Professional Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2002-06-27
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: STEFANIE T SHARP
Type: Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 71 WASHINGTON ST, RENO, NV, 89503
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Director | VIJAY SEKHON M.D. | 590 EUREKA AVENUE, RENO, NV, 89512 | Active |
| President | VIJAY SEKHON, M.D. | 590 EUREKA AVENUE, Reno, NV | Active |
| Treasurer | RONALD SWANGER, M.D. | 590 EUREKA AVENUE, Reno, NV | Active |
| Secretary | RONALD SWANGER, M.D. | 590 EUREKA AVENUE, Reno, NV | Active |
| Director | RONALD SWANGER, M.D. | 590 EUREKA AVENUE, Reno, NV | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$7,500Total Contributed
2Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
SEKHON, VIJAY S DR.Probable Match
Matched via officer: VIJAY SEKHON M.D. (Director)
$1,000 across 2 contributions
SWANGER, RONALD SCOTT DR.Probable Match
Matched via officer: RONALD SWANGER, M.D. (Treasurer)
$3,000 across 2 contributions
SWANGER, RONALD SCOTT DR. DR.Probable Match
Matched via officer: RONALD SWANGER, M.D. (Treasurer)
$3,000 across 3 contributions
Ronald SwangerProbable Match
Matched via officer: RONALD SWANGER, M.D. (Treasurer)
$200 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Bathgate | Carson City, School Trustee, District 1 | Unspecified | $200 | 1 |
Ronald SwangerProbable Match
Matched via officer: RONALD SWANGER, M.D. (Treasurer)
$300 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada Medical Political Action Committee (NEMPAC) | PAC | $300 | 1 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$74,495
-88% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
4,666
Total Claims
5,484
$ Per Patient
$16
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#29 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.2
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $16,511 | |
| 2019 | $7,883 | |
| 2020 | $10,386 | |
| 2021 | $12,134 | |
| 2022 | $10,187 | |
| 2023 | $17,393 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74177 | CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (with contrast dye) | 473 | $31,427 | 42.2% | $66 |
| 71045 | Chest X-ray (single view) | 4,037 | $24,807 | 33.3% | $6 |
| 70450 | CT scan of the head (without contrast dye) | 366 | $10,456 | 14.0% | $29 |
| 71046 | Chest X-ray (two views — front and side) | 489 | $3,279 | 4.4% | $7 |
| 76815 | Limited ultrasound of pregnancy (quick check) | 53 | $1,326 | 1.8% | $25 |
| 76805 | Ultrasound of pregnancy (after first trimester) | 29 | $1,225 | 1.6% | $42 |
| 76816 | Follow-up ultrasound of pregnancy | 24 | $1,015 | 1.4% | $42 |
| 74176 | CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (without contrast) | 13 | $959 | 1.3% | $74 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.