← Back to Provider List

SHAHABUDDIN KHAN, MD

Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Disease · LAS VEGAS, NV

3150 N TENAYA WAY STE. 320, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128

NPI Number
1639134828
Street View of 3150 N TENAYA WAY STE. 320, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128

Practice location · View on Google Maps

Total Medicaid Payments
$67,117
-82% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,331
Total Claims
1,998
$ Per Patient
$50
Specialty avg: $35
Specialty Rank
#27 of 93
Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Disease providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$369,495
Average total for Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Disease
Claims per Patient
1.5
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$67,117

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
99215Office visit for a complex or serious problem (established patient)184$25,521
38.0%
$139
93306Heart ultrasound (echocardiogram)124$16,839
25.1%
$136
78452Nuclear medicine imaging (using small amounts of radioactive material)12$6,582
9.8%
$549
93010Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)1,504$5,954
8.9%
$4
99233Hospital care — daily check by your doctor (complex update)29$2,833
4.2%
$98
A9500Technetium tc-99m sestamibi, diagnostic, per study dose12$2,551
3.8%
$213
99205New patient office visit — comprehensive visit for a complex problem12$2,527
3.8%
$211
99214Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient)15$1,382
2.1%
$92
93000Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)81$1,193
1.8%
$15
93922Blood vessel ultrasound or study13$872
1.3%
$67
93015Heart monitoring test (ECG/EKG)12$863
1.3%
$72

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.