RESET PRIMARY CARE, LTD. SOS Verified
2810 W CHARLESTON BLVD STE 70, LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
NPI Number
1649739087
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: Reset Primary Care, Ltd.
Entity Number: E0403302018-7
Entity Type: Domestic Limited-Liability Company
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2018-08-27
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: MATTHEW RASHBROOK
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 616 S. 8TH ST, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89101
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mmember | HUONG NANCY RASHBROOK | 2810 W Charleston Blvd, Suite 70, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$654Total Contributed
2Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
RASHBROOK, HUONG NANCYProbable Match
Matched via officer: HUONG NANCY RASHBROOK (Mmember)
$200 across 2 contributions
Huong RashbrookProbable Match
Matched via officer: HUONG NANCY RASHBROOK (Mmember)
$254 across 2 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Giunchigliani | Governor | Democratic Party | $254 | 2 |
Huong Nancy RashbrookPossible Match
Matched via officer: HUONG NANCY RASHBROOK (Mmember)
$200 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bita Yeager | District Court Judge, District 8, Department 1 | Unspecified | $200 | 1 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$41,073
-75% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,976
Total Claims
3,227
$ Per Patient
$14
Specialty avg: $48
Specialty Rank
#22 of 41
Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$165,383
Average total for Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $162 | |
| 2020 | $11,194 | |
| 2021 | $19,036 | |
| 2022 | $4,370 | |
| 2023 | $2,119 | |
| 2024 | $4,192 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0181 | Physician or allowed practitioner supervision of a patient receiving medicare-covered services provided by a participating home health agency (patient not present) requiring complex and multidiscip... | 1,292 | $20,557 | 50.1% | $16 |
| 99349 | Home visit follow-up — complex problem | 810 | $8,350 | 20.3% | $10 |
| 99496 | Medical service or procedure | 131 | $4,814 | 11.7% | $37 |
| G0108 | Diabetes self-management training for individuals | 337 | $2,289 | 5.6% | $7 |
| 99497 | Medical service or procedure | 128 | $1,710 | 4.2% | $13 |
| G0180 | Physician or allowed practitioner certification for medicare-covered home health services under a home health plan of care (patient not present) | 204 | $1,502 | 3.7% | $7 |
| G0179 | Physician or allowed practitioner re-certification for medicare-covered home health services under a home health plan of care (patient not present) | 133 | $864 | 2.1% | $6 |
| G0439 | Annual wellness visit — follow-up | 133 | $357 | 0.9% | $3 |
| 99344 | Home visit — serious, comprehensive problem | 14 | $350 | 0.9% | $25 |
| 99350 | Home visit follow-up — unstable condition | 12 | $278 | 0.7% | $23 |
| 99406 | Medical service or procedure | 33 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.