← Back to Provider List

NEVADA BEST PCA, LLC SOS Verified

Technician, Personal Care Attendant · LAS VEGAS, NV

2575 MONTESSOURI ST STE 201, LAS VEGAS, NV 89117

NPI Number
1659616407
Street View of 2575 MONTESSOURI ST STE 201, LAS VEGAS, NV 89117

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: NEVADA BEST PCA, LLC
Entity Number: E0360592016-6
Entity Type: Domestic Limited-Liability Company
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2016-08-15
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: SONA HAKOBYAN
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 8324 W. CHARLESTON BLVD #2018, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89117
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
ManagerSONA HAKOBYAN2575 MONTESSOURI ST STE 201, Las Vegas, NVActive
Total Medicaid Payments
$11,038,248
+256% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
8,813
Total Claims
110,074
$ Per Patient
$1,252
Specialty avg: $980
Specialty Rank
#2 of 31
Technician, Personal Care Attendant providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$3,104,173
Average total for Technician, Personal Care Attendant
Claims per Patient
12.5
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$551,331
2019$931,613
2020$1,320,413
2021$1,913,220
2022$2,454,971
2023$1,861,637
2024$2,005,064

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
T1019Personal care services — a helper who assists with daily activities like bathing, dressing, and eating (per 15 minutes)110,074$11,038,248
100.0%
$100

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.