SARAH WOOD, M.D.
2011 PINTO LN STE 200, LAS VEGAS, NV 89106
NPI Number
1689985046
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$78,756
-94% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,766
Total Claims
2,070
$ Per Patient
$45
Specialty avg: $98
Specialty Rank
#15 of 22
Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal & Fetal Medicine providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$1,401,600
Average total for Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal & Fetal Medicine
Claims per Patient
1.2
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $78,756 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76816 | Follow-up ultrasound of pregnancy | 412 | $18,495 | 23.5% | $45 |
| 76818 | Ultrasound | 301 | $15,528 | 19.7% | $52 |
| 76817 | Transvaginal ultrasound of pregnancy | 253 | $11,300 | 14.3% | $45 |
| 76805 | Ultrasound of pregnancy (after first trimester) | 193 | $10,525 | 13.4% | $55 |
| 76811 | Detailed ultrasound of pregnancy (high-risk) | 107 | $9,583 | 12.2% | $90 |
| 59025 | Pregnancy, delivery, and maternity care | 396 | $4,551 | 5.8% | $11 |
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 163 | $3,983 | 5.1% | $24 |
| 76815 | Limited ultrasound of pregnancy (quick check) | 169 | $3,425 | 4.3% | $20 |
| 99232 | Hospital care — daily check by your doctor (moderate update) | 44 | $846 | 1.1% | $19 |
| 76820 | Ultrasound | 32 | $521 | 0.7% | $16 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.