DESERT INN WOMENS CLINIC CHTD SOS Verified
1900 E DESERT INN RD, LAS VEGAS, NV 89169
NPI Number
1730484247
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: DESERT INN WOMEN'S CLINIC (SILVER), CHTD.
Entity Number: E0561002010-4
Entity Type: Domestic Professional Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2010-11-22
Name Match: 83%
Registered Agent
Name: FRANK P. SILVER, M.D.
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 1900 E DESERT INN ROAD, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89169
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| President | FRANK SILVER MD | 1771 E. FLAMINGO RD, STE 220B, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
| Treasurer | FRANK SILVER MD | 1771 E. FLAMINGO RD, STE 220B, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
| Secretary | FRANK SILVER MD | 1771 E. FLAMINGO RD, STE 220B, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
| Director | FRANK SILVER MD | 1771 E. FLAMINGO RD, STE 220B, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$5,200Total Contributed
2Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
Frank SilverProbable Match
Matched via officer: FRANK SILVER MD (President)
$4,000 across 5 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tisha Black | Attorney General | Unspecified | $4,000 | 5 |
SILVER, FRANKProbable Match
Matched via officer: FRANK SILVER MD (President)
$200 across 1 contribution
Frank SilverProbable Match
Matched via officer: FRANK SILVER MD (President)
$1,000 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Lombardo | Governor | Republican Party | $1,000 | 1 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$190,668
+197% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,910
Total Claims
3,653
$ Per Patient
$66
Specialty avg: $67
Specialty Rank
#2 of 11
Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gynecology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$64,108
Average total for Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gynecology
Claims per Patient
1.3
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $10,849 | |
| 2019 | $46,052 | |
| 2020 | $36,316 | |
| 2021 | $33,830 | |
| 2022 | $29,850 | |
| 2023 | $26,895 | |
| 2024 | $6,877 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99214 | Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient) | 2,234 | $145,526 | 76.3% | $65 |
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 634 | $29,763 | 15.6% | $47 |
| 99203 | New patient office visit — moderate problem | 74 | $5,552 | 2.9% | $75 |
| Q0091 | Screening papanicolaou smear; obtaining, preparing and conveyance of cervical or vaginal smear to laboratory | 488 | $3,965 | 2.1% | $8 |
| 99385 | Wellness checkup — new patient, ages 18-39 | 25 | $2,331 | 1.2% | $93 |
| 99204 | New patient office visit — detailed visit for a serious problem | 23 | $1,626 | 0.9% | $71 |
| 99395 | Wellness checkup — ages 18-39 | 12 | $1,022 | 0.5% | $85 |
| G0101 | Cervical or vaginal cancer screening — pelvic and breast exam | 27 | $583 | 0.3% | $22 |
| 81025 | Pregnancy test (urine) | 58 | $219 | 0.1% | $4 |
| 81002 | Urinalysis — quick dipstick test | 78 | $80 | 0.0% | $1 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.