← Back to Provider List

NEVADA BEST PCA, LLC SOS Verified

Technician, Attendant Care Provider · LAS VEGAS, NV

2575 MONTESSOURI ST STE 201, LAS VEGAS, NV 89117

NPI Number
1730578139
Street View of 2575 MONTESSOURI ST STE 201, LAS VEGAS, NV 89117

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: NEVADA BEST PCA, LLC
Entity Number: E0360592016-6
Entity Type: Domestic Limited-Liability Company
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2016-08-15
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: SONA HAKOBYAN
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 8324 W. CHARLESTON BLVD #2018, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89117
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
ManagerSONA HAKOBYAN2575 MONTESSOURI ST STE 201, Las Vegas, NVActive
Total Medicaid Payments
$430,897
-79% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
630
Total Claims
4,107
$ Per Patient
$684
Specialty avg: $934
Specialty Rank
#8 of 12
Technician, Attendant Care Provider providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$2,070,374
Average total for Technician, Attendant Care Provider
Claims per Patient
6.5
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2021$2,186
2022$20,201
2023$19,240
2024$389,269

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
S5130Homemaker services — help with cooking, shopping, and housekeeping (per 15 minutes)2,625$254,112
59.0%
$97
S5125Attendant care — personal assistant to help with daily activities (per 15 minutes)1,482$176,784
41.0%
$119

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.