NET CARE LLC
3216 W CHARLESTON BLVD STE C, LAS VEGAS, NV 89102
NPI Number
1740906692
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Pending Review
Multiple SOS Matches
Total Medicaid Payments
$619,547
-22% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,265
Total Claims
15,196
$ Per Patient
$274
Specialty avg: $92
Specialty Rank
#14 of 51
General Practice providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$789,662
Average total for General Practice
Claims per Patient
6.7
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $204,561 | |
| 2023 | $414,985 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90876 | Individual psychophysiological therapy — biofeedback training | 5,019 | $455,696 | 73.6% | $91 |
| Q3014 | Telehealth originating site facility fee | 5,020 | $84,307 | 13.6% | $17 |
| 99211 | Simple office visit — quick check-in with a nurse or doctor | 5,022 | $72,610 | 11.7% | $14 |
| 96158 | Medical service or procedure | 83 | $3,591 | 0.6% | $43 |
| 96132 | Neuropsychological testing — evaluation by a psychologist (first hour) | 13 | $1,361 | 0.2% | $105 |
| 96133 | Neuropsychological testing — additional testing time | 13 | $1,038 | 0.2% | $80 |
| 96136 | Psychological testing — administered by a psychologist (first 30 min) | 13 | $490 | 0.1% | $38 |
| 96137 | Psychological testing — additional 30 minutes | 13 | $454 | 0.1% | $35 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.