← Back to Provider List

20 20 VISION, LLC SOS Verified

Optometrist ยท SPARKS, NV

738 PRATER WAY, SPARKS, NV 89431

NPI Number
1770803843
Street View of 738 PRATER WAY, SPARKS, NV 89431

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: 20/20 VISION, LLC.
Entity Number: E0095182010-9
Entity Type: Domestic Limited-Liability Company
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2010-03-03
Status Changed: 2013-04-26
Name Match: 80%
Registered Agent
Name: FANNY CHAN
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 738 PRATER WAY, Sparks, NV, 89431
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
ManagerFANNY CHAN738 PRATER WAY, Sparks, NVActive
Total Medicaid Payments
$53,217
-71% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,050
Total Claims
1,149
$ Per Patient
$51
Specialty avg: $38
Specialty Rank
#162 of 377
Optometrist providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$181,896
Average total for Optometrist
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$7,528
2019$1,436
2020$1,574
2022$15,652
2023$12,428
2024$14,598

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
V2020Frames, purchases493$41,989
78.9%
$85
92015Eye exam or vision test573$8,497
16.0%
$15
92340Eye exam or vision test46$1,270
2.4%
$28
V2100Sphere, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00, per lens13$799
1.5%
$61
V2784Lens, polycarbonate or equal, any index, per lens12$528
1.0%
$44
V2103Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, .12 to 2.00d cylinder, per lens12$134
0.3%
$11

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.