← Back to Provider List

PR ACQUISITION CORPORATION SOS Verified

Clinic/Center, Rehabilitation · LAS VEGAS, NV

2650 N TENAYA WAY, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128

NPI Number
1790746477
Street View of 2650 N TENAYA WAY, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: PR ACQUISITION CORPORATION
Entity Number: C4424-1994
Entity Type: Foreign Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 1994-03-22
Status Changed: 2017-05-24
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM**
Type: Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 701 S CARSON ST STE 200, Carson City, NV, 89701
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
PresidentChad Smith4714 GETTYSBURG ROAD, Mechanicsburg, PAActive
SecretaryJohn Duggan4714 GETTYSBURG ROAD, Mechanicsburg, PAActive
DirectorJohn Duggan4714 GETTYSBURG ROAD, Mechanicsburg, PAActive
TreasurerRobert Kido4714 GETTYSBURG ROAD, Mechanicsburg, PAActive
Campaign Contributions
$14,862Total Contributed
6Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
Chad SmithProbable Match
Matched via officer: Chad Smith (President)
$500 across 1 contribution
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Mark HutchisonLieutenant GovernorRepublican Party$5001
SMITH, CHADProbable Match
Matched via officer: Chad Smith (President)
$1,150 across 13 contributions
SMITH, CHARLESPossible Match
Matched via officer: Chad Smith (President)
$11,436 across 78 contributions
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
CORTEZ MASTO, CATHERINEU.S. SenateDEM$40,00040
MASTO, CATHERINE CORTEZU.S. SenateDEM$20,00020
Chaplain SmithPossible Match
Matched via officer: Chad Smith (President)
$276 across 1 contribution
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Phillip GravietState Senate, District 10Unspecified$2761
Chadwycke SmithPossible Match
Matched via officer: Chad Smith (President)
$500 across 2 contributions
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Geoconda HughesOffice Not SpecifiedDemocratic Party$5002
Charles SmithPossible Match
Matched via officer: Chad Smith (President)
$1,000 across 2 contributions
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Dina NealState Senate, District 4Democratic Party$1,0002
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$77,461
-89% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
1,336
Total Claims
3,227
$ Per Patient
$58
Specialty avg: $108
Specialty Rank
#6 of 20
Clinic/Center, Rehabilitation providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$678,172
Average total for Clinic/Center, Rehabilitation
Claims per Patient
2.4
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$5,349
2019$72,112

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
97530Therapeutic activities — exercises and tasks to improve daily function812$28,670
37.0%
$35
97112Neuromuscular re-education — retraining muscles and movement patterns860$22,505
29.1%
$26
97110Physical therapy exercises to build strength, flexibility, or range of motion809$18,149
23.4%
$22
97150Group therapy session (physical, occupational, or speech)568$6,516
8.4%
$11
97140Manual therapy — hands-on treatment like massage or joint mobilization76$1,093
1.4%
$14
97010Physical therapy, occupational therapy, or rehabilitation89$372
0.5%
$4
97164Physical therapy re-evaluation13$157
0.2%
$12

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.