DR. JULIE CHANG, O D, INC
4388 E CRAIG RD STE 150, LAS VEGAS, NV 89115
NPI Number
1811171283
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Pending Review
Multiple SOS Matches
Total Medicaid Payments
$141,098
-22% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
2,794
Total Claims
2,909
$ Per Patient
$51
Specialty avg: $38
Specialty Rank
#98 of 377
Optometrist providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$181,896
Average total for Optometrist
Claims per Patient
1.0
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $14,129 | |
| 2019 | $16,520 | |
| 2020 | $13,241 | |
| 2021 | $23,059 | |
| 2022 | $18,388 | |
| 2023 | $26,918 | |
| 2024 | $28,844 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V2020 | Frames, purchases | 1,011 | $76,336 | 54.1% | $76 |
| 92340 | Eye exam or vision test | 623 | $19,918 | 14.1% | $32 |
| 92014 | Eye exam or vision test | 163 | $13,865 | 9.8% | $85 |
| 92015 | Eye exam or vision test | 790 | $13,379 | 9.5% | $17 |
| V2784 | Lens, polycarbonate or equal, any index, per lens | 159 | $7,240 | 5.1% | $46 |
| V2103 | Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, .12 to 2.00d cylinder, per lens | 101 | $6,475 | 4.6% | $64 |
| 92004 | Eye exam or vision test | 31 | $2,457 | 1.7% | $79 |
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 18 | $837 | 0.6% | $47 |
| V2750 | Anti-reflective coating, per lens | 13 | $590 | 0.4% | $45 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.