CHRISTINA DANLEY, O.D.
3915 BAKER LN, RENO, NV 89509
NPI Number
1821297896
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$104,127
-43% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
4,550
Total Claims
4,694
$ Per Patient
$23
Specialty avg: $38
Specialty Rank
#122 of 377
Optometrist providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$181,896
Average total for Optometrist
Claims per Patient
1.0
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $5,713 | |
| 2020 | $2,860 | |
| 2023 | $14,190 | |
| 2024 | $81,363 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V2025 | Deluxe frame | 621 | $30,000 | 28.8% | $48 |
| 92014 | Eye exam or vision test | 490 | $23,260 | 22.3% | $47 |
| 92340 | Eye exam or vision test | 999 | $15,200 | 14.6% | $15 |
| V2020 | Frames, purchases | 589 | $13,137 | 12.6% | $22 |
| 92004 | Eye exam or vision test | 223 | $11,336 | 10.9% | $51 |
| V2100 | Sphere, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00, per lens | 270 | $7,109 | 6.8% | $26 |
| 92015 | Eye exam or vision test | 456 | $2,580 | 2.5% | $6 |
| V2103 | Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, .12 to 2.00d cylinder, per lens | 548 | $1,320 | 1.3% | $2 |
| V2784 | Lens, polycarbonate or equal, any index, per lens | 477 | $175 | 0.2% | $0 |
| V2104 | Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, 2.12 to 4.00d cylinder, per lens | 21 | $10 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.