TOE-TAL FAMILY FOOTCARE SOS Verified
3317 SALMON CREEK DR, LAS VEGAS, NV 89129
NPI Number
1821749615
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: Toe-Tal Family Footcare, P.C.
Entity Number: E18633002021-1
Entity Type: Domestic Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2021-11-01
Status Changed: 2021-11-01
Name Match: 90%
Registered Agent
Name: William Boardman
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 3317 Salmon Creek Dr., Las Vegas, NV, 89129
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| President | Mark Miller | 1726 Avenida La Posta, Encinitas, CA | Active |
| Director | William Boardman | 7628 Marble Mesa Ct, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$69,289Total Contributed
20Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
Mark MillerProbable Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$2,500 across 3 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada Optometric PAC | PAC | $2,500 | 3 |
MILLER, MARSHA SProbable Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$14,250 across 30 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, SUSIE | U.S. House | DEM | $390,000 | 810 |
| TITUS, DINA | U.S. House | DEM | $50,000 | 100 |
mark millerProbable Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$240 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Miller | State Assembly, District 15 | Republican Party | $240 | 1 |
MILLER, MARKProbable Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$4,790 across 163 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROSEN, JACKY | U.S. Senate | DEM | $14,375 | 450 |
Mark MillerProbable Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$138 across 4 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Giunchigliani | Governor | Democratic Party | $138 | 4 |
Mark MillerProbable Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$30 across 2 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Giunchigliani | Governor | Democratic Party | $30 | 2 |
MILLER, MARSHAProbable Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$20,325 across 75 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROSEN, JACKY | U.S. Senate | DEM | $8,750 | 50 |
| CORTEZ MASTO, CATHERINE | U.S. Senate | DEM | $5,000 | 40 |
| MASTO, CATHERINE CORTEZ | U.S. Senate | DEM | $2,500 | 20 |
Mary-Anne MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$2,000 across 3 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven Wolfson | Clark County District Attorney | Democratic Party | $1,000 | 1 |
| Elana Graham | Justice of the Peace, Las Vegas Township, Department 1 | Nonpartisan | $1,000 | 2 |
Marsha MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$4,250 across 6 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Sisolak | Governor | Democratic Party | $3,000 | 3 |
| Ross Miller | Office Not Specified | Democratic Party | $1,000 | 2 |
| Liz Becker | State Senate, District 18 | Democratic Party | $250 | 1 |
MILLER, MARSHA S.Possible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$10,275 across 50 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROSEN, JACKY | U.S. Senate | DEM | $156,875 | 1000 |
| LEE, SUSIE | U.S. House | DEM | $75,000 | 150 |
| CORTEZ MASTO, CATHERINE | U.S. Senate | DEM | $20,000 | 80 |
| MASTO, CATHERINE CORTEZ | U.S. Senate | DEM | $10,000 | 40 |
MILLER, MARYBETHPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$2,100 across 8 contributions
Marsha MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$250 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Ford | Attorney General | Democratic Party | $250 | 1 |
Marsha MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$750 across 3 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolyn Goodman | Office Not Specified | Unspecified | $500 | 2 |
| John Moran | Board of Regents, District 13 | Unspecified | $250 | 1 |
MILLER, MARCPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$1,110 across 10 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUTTON, LISA SONG | U.S. House | REP | $6,750 | 18 |
Marsha MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$600 across 3 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Ford | Attorney General | Democratic Party | $500 | 2 |
| Brian Knudsen | City of Las Vegas, City Council, Ward 1 | Democratic Party | $100 | 1 |
Mark MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$2,500 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zachary Conine | State Treasurer | Democratic Party | $2,500 | 1 |
MILLER, MARK DPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$2,911 across 43 contributions
Mark MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$20 across 2 contributions
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Sisolak | Governor | Democratic Party | $20 | 2 |
Mark MillerPossible Match
Matched via officer: Mark Miller (President)
$250 across 1 contribution
| Candidate | Office | Party | Total | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ward | City of Reno, City Council, Ward 6 | Unspecified | $250 | 1 |
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$58
-100% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
14,005
Total Claims
14,791
$ Per Patient
$0
Specialty avg: $7
Specialty Rank
#7 of 7
Podiatrist, Primary Podiatric Medicine providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$94,462
Average total for Podiatrist, Primary Podiatric Medicine
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $0 | |
| 2023 | $0 | |
| 2024 | $58 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11720 | Nail surgery or treatment | 1,388 | $26 | 45.5% | $0 |
| 11306 | Shaving of a skin growth | 1,090 | $24 | 42.2% | $0 |
| 93922 | Blood vessel ultrasound or study | 245 | $5 | 8.2% | $0 |
| G0127 | Trimming of dystrophic nails, any number | 1,411 | $2 | 4.1% | $0 |
| 99348 | Home visit follow-up — moderate problem | 1,398 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G9990 | Patient did not receive any pneumococcal conjugate or polysaccharide vaccine on or after their 19th birthday and before the end of the measurement period | 255 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 1036F | Medical service or procedure | 97 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8410 | Footwear evaluation performed and documented | 561 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8404 | Lower extremity neurological exam performed and documented | 565 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 99349 | Home visit follow-up — complex problem | 29 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8785 | Blood pressure reading not documented, reason not given | 14 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G9720 | Hospice services for patient occurred any time during the measurement period | 26 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 11305 | Shaving of a skin growth | 443 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8483 | Influenza immunization was not administered for reasons documented by clinician (for example., patient allergy or other medical reasons, patient declined or other patient reasons | 384 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G9903 | Patient screened for tobacco use and identified as a tobacco non-user | 652 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 99343 | Home visit — complex problem | 64 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 11308 | Shaving of a skin growth | 26 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| M1159 | Hospice services provided to patient any time during the measurement period | 13 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 11056 | Trimming or paring a skin lesion or callus | 64 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8950 | Elevated or hypertensive blood pressure reading documented, and the indicated follow-up is documented | 13 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 99344 | Home visit — serious, comprehensive problem | 13 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8427 | Eligible clinician attests to documenting in the medical record they obtained, updated, or reviewed the patient's current medications | 2,081 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8482 | Influenza immunization administered or previously received | 117 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 11732 | Nail surgery or treatment | 153 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 11730 | Partial removal of a toenail or fingernail | 1,006 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 12 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 11721 | Nail surgery or treatment | 606 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 0518F | Medical service or procedure | 1,264 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8783 | Normal blood pressure reading documented, follow-up not required | 19 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 10060 | Drainage of an abscess (simple — draining an infected lump) | 35 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 11307 | Shaving of a skin growth | 417 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 99212 | Office visit for a minor problem (established patient) | 43 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 99342 | Home visit — moderate problem | 163 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 1123F | Medical service or procedure | 124 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.