DAVID SMITH, O.D.
1485 W WARM SPRINGS RD, HENDERSON, NV 89014
NPI Number
1861484347
Practice location · View on Google Maps
Total Medicaid Payments
$235,121
+29% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
8,313
Total Claims
8,461
$ Per Patient
$28
Specialty avg: $38
Specialty Rank
#63 of 377
Optometrist providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$181,896
Average total for Optometrist
Claims per Patient
1.0
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $42,819 | |
| 2019 | $24,514 | |
| 2020 | $33,195 | |
| 2021 | $36,913 | |
| 2022 | $50,364 | |
| 2023 | $45,364 | |
| 2024 | $1,952 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92014 | Eye exam or vision test | 1,806 | $88,163 | 37.5% | $49 |
| V2020 | Frames, purchases | 1,986 | $61,611 | 26.2% | $31 |
| V2100 | Sphere, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00, per lens | 1,088 | $30,259 | 12.9% | $28 |
| 92340 | Eye exam or vision test | 1,446 | $21,238 | 9.0% | $15 |
| 92004 | Eye exam or vision test | 330 | $15,984 | 6.8% | $48 |
| 92015 | Eye exam or vision test | 828 | $9,274 | 3.9% | $11 |
| V2784 | Lens, polycarbonate or equal, any index, per lens | 587 | $5,416 | 2.3% | $9 |
| V2025 | Deluxe frame | 56 | $1,350 | 0.6% | $24 |
| V2103 | Spherocylinder, single vision, plano to plus or minus 4.00d sphere, .12 to 2.00d cylinder, per lens | 319 | $1,056 | 0.4% | $3 |
| 92083 | Eye exam or vision test | 15 | $770 | 0.3% | $51 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.