JXE VENTURES LLC SOS Verified
4255 E CHARLESTON BLVD STE F&G, LAS VEGAS, NV 89104
NPI Number
1881263309
Practice location · View on Google Maps
SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: JXE Ventures LLC
Entity Number: E12828642021-7
Entity Type: Domestic Limited-Liability Company
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 2021-03-04
Status Changed: 2021-03-04
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: Juan Ramos
Type: Non-Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 377 Castellari Dr, Las Vegas, NV, 89138
Officers / Principals
| Title | Name | Address | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manager | Juan Ramos | 377 Castellari Dr, Las Vegas, NV | Active |
Campaign Contributions
$1,645Total Contributed
Officer / Individual Matches
RAMOS, JUANPossible Match
Matched via officer: Juan Ramos (Manager)
$1,645 across 97 contributions
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$238,007
+287% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
7,142
Total Claims
8,042
$ Per Patient
$33
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#18 of 244
Nurse Practitioner, Family providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$61,530
Average total for Nurse Practitioner, Family
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person
Payments by Year
How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.
| Year | Total Paid | % of Max |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $38,832 | |
| 2023 | $82,471 | |
| 2024 | $116,704 |
Procedure Code Breakdown
The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.
| HCPCS Code | Description | Claims | Paid | % of Total | Avg per Claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99213 | Office visit for a simple problem (established patient) | 3,747 | $175,802 | 73.9% | $47 |
| 99203 | New patient office visit — moderate problem | 326 | $20,058 | 8.4% | $62 |
| 99214 | Office visit for a moderate problem (established patient) | 230 | $14,133 | 5.9% | $61 |
| 99396 | Wellness checkup — ages 40-64 | 88 | $6,892 | 2.9% | $78 |
| G0444 | Annual depression screening | 581 | $6,233 | 2.6% | $11 |
| 99395 | Wellness checkup — ages 18-39 | 74 | $5,895 | 2.5% | $80 |
| 99385 | Wellness checkup — new patient, ages 18-39 | 61 | $4,575 | 1.9% | $75 |
| 81002 | Urinalysis — quick dipstick test | 1,103 | $1,231 | 0.5% | $1 |
| 99386 | Wellness checkup — new patient, ages 40-64 | 14 | $1,119 | 0.5% | $80 |
| 82962 | Blood chemistry test (checking specific substances in your blood) | 772 | $832 | 0.3% | $1 |
| G0447 | Face-to-face behavioral counseling for obesity, 15 minutes | 39 | $659 | 0.3% | $17 |
| 87804 | Flu test (rapid) | 17 | $126 | 0.1% | $7 |
| 36415 | Drawing blood from a vein (routine blood draw) | 50 | $116 | 0.0% | $2 |
| 87880 | Strep throat test (rapid) | 15 | $109 | 0.0% | $7 |
| 87807 | Microbiology test — checking for infections (bacteria, viruses, fungi) | 15 | $104 | 0.0% | $7 |
| 96127 | Brief emotional or behavioral screening (like a depression or anxiety questionnaire) | 30 | $83 | 0.0% | $3 |
| 99211 | Simple office visit — quick check-in with a nurse or doctor | 14 | $25 | 0.0% | $2 |
| 36416 | Finger or heel stick for blood collection | 17 | $16 | 0.0% | $1 |
| 99173 | Other medical service | 29 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| G8417 | Bmi is documented above normal parameters and a follow-up plan is documented | 767 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
| 99000 | Special medical service | 53 | $0 | 0.0% | $0 |
About This Data
This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.