← Back to Provider List

TAHOE CARSON RADIOLOGY LOOS ET AL LTD SOS Verified

Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology · CARSON CITY, NV

2874 N CARSON ST STE 300, CARSON CITY, NV 89706

NPI Number
1902838352
Street View of 2874 N CARSON ST STE 300, CARSON CITY, NV 89706

Practice location · View on Google Maps

SOS Verification: Verified
Entity Name: TAHOE CARSON RADIOLOGY, LOOS ET AL., LTD.
Entity Number: C11495-1991
Entity Type: Domestic Professional Corporation
Entity Status: Active
Formation Date: 1991-12-16
Status Changed: 2010-02-05
Name Match: 95%
Registered Agent
Name: MICHAEL R KEALY
Type: Commercial Registered Agent
Address: 50 W LIBERTY ST STE 750, Reno, NV, 89501
Officers / Principals
TitleNameAddressStatus
DirectorJohn Erogul MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
DirectorStephen Loos MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
SecretaryJohn Erogul MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
DirectorRyan Redelman MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
DirectorDaniel Kirkham MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
PresidentRyan Redelman MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
DirectorWilliam Pace MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
DirectorJonathan Hester MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
TreasurerWilliam Pace MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
DirectorBradley Clark MD2874 N Carson St. PO Box 2830, Carson City, NVActive
Campaign Contributions
$856Total Contributed
1Candidates Supported
Officer / Individual Matches
Stephen LoosProbable Match
Matched via officer: Stephen Loos MD (Director)
$500 across 1 contribution
CandidateOfficePartyTotalCount
Keep Our Doctors in NevadaPAC$5001
CLARK, BRADLEYPossible Match
Matched via officer: Bradley Clark MD (Director)
$356 across 9 contributions
Data Notice Campaign contribution matches are based on automated name matching against Nevada Secretary of State campaign finance records. Corporate matches compare registered business names. Officer matches compare individual names and may include false positives due to common names. Contributions are to Nevada state and local candidates only.
Total Medicaid Payments
$1,048,352
+75% vs specialty average
Patients Seen
58,315
Total Claims
65,941
$ Per Patient
$18
Specialty avg: $33
Specialty Rank
#8 of 167
Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology providers in Nevada
Peer Average
$597,734
Average total for Radiology, Diagnostic Radiology
Claims per Patient
1.1
Average visits / services per person

Payments by Year

How much Medicaid paid this provider each year. Large jumps can indicate changes in practice volume or billing patterns.

Year Total Paid % of Max
2018$195,618
2019$176,227
2020$115,494
2021$170,316
2022$203,414
2023$160,541
2024$26,742

Procedure Code Breakdown

The specific medical services this provider billed Medicaid for. Each HCPCS/CPT code represents a different type of visit, test, or treatment.

HCPCS Code Description Claims Paid % of Total Avg per Claim
74177CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (with contrast dye)6,288$433,118
41.3%
$69
70450CT scan of the head (without contrast dye)6,583$182,868
17.4%
$28
71045Chest X-ray (single view)24,861$141,523
13.5%
$6
71046Chest X-ray (two views — front and side)12,228$93,786
8.9%
$8
77067Screening mammogram (breast cancer screening)2,268$52,992
5.1%
$23
77063Breast imaging (mammogram or MRI)2,023$41,977
4.0%
$21
71275CT angiography of the chest (looking at blood vessels)576$35,770
3.4%
$62
74176CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis (without contrast)386$24,275
2.3%
$63
76705Ultrasound of the abdomen (limited)268$6,164
0.6%
$23
72148MRI of the lower spine (without contrast)75$4,398
0.4%
$59
76642Ultrasound176$4,356
0.4%
$25
73721MRI of a joint in the lower body (hip, knee, or ankle)72$4,122
0.4%
$57
76830Transvaginal ultrasound of the uterus105$3,430
0.3%
$33
70553MRI of the brain (with and without contrast dye)37$3,096
0.3%
$84
77066Breast imaging (mammogram or MRI)84$2,494
0.2%
$30
G0279Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to 77065 or 77066)82$2,056
0.2%
$25
72100X-ray of the lower spine (lumbar)203$1,907
0.2%
$9
76700Ultrasound of the abdomen (complete)50$1,571
0.1%
$31
71250CT scan of the chest (without contrast dye)43$1,348
0.1%
$31
73630X-ray of the foot196$1,332
0.1%
$7
76805Ultrasound of pregnancy (after first trimester)24$1,174
0.1%
$49
93975Blood vessel ultrasound or study13$1,025
0.1%
$79
93971Blood vessel ultrasound or study77$1,018
0.1%
$13
73030X-ray of the shoulder60$497
0.0%
$8
73610X-ray of the ankle (complete)64$470
0.0%
$7
73130X-ray of the hand48$397
0.0%
$8
76815Limited ultrasound of pregnancy (quick check)13$386
0.0%
$30
76536Ultrasound of the head and neck soft tissue13$269
0.0%
$21
73562X-ray of the knee (3 views)28$244
0.0%
$9
74018X-ray of the abdomen (single view)28$188
0.0%
$7
73110X-ray of the wrist (complete)12$102
0.0%
$8
G9637Final reports with documentation of one or more dose reduction techniques (for example., automated exposure control, adjustment of the ma and/or kv according to patient size6,230$0
0.0%
$0
G9321Count of previous ct (any type of ct) and cardiac nuclear medicine (myocardial perfusion or infarct avid imaging) studies documented in the 12-month period prior to the current study1,876$0
0.0%
$0
G9551Final reports for imaging studies without an incidentally found lesion noted455$0
0.0%
$0
3341FMedical service or procedure64$0
0.0%
$0
G9638Final reports without documentation of one or more dose reduction techniques (for example., automated exposure control, adjustment of the ma and/or kv according to patient size16$0
0.0%
$0
G9557Final reports for ct, cta, mri or mra studies of the chest or neck without an incidentally found thyroid nodule < 1.0 cm noted or no nodule found169$0
0.0%
$0
7025FMedical service or procedure147$0
0.0%
$0

About This Data

This data comes from the HHS Medicaid Provider Spending dataset (opendata.hhs.gov). It shows payments made through Nevada Medicaid from 2018–2024. High payments do not mean a provider is doing anything wrong — some specialties naturally cost more, and busy providers see more patients. But unusually high numbers compared to peers can be worth a closer look.